Recognising and Responding to Suicide-Risk Factors in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
-
Published:2024-05-27
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2731-5533
-
Container-title:Journal of Prevention
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J of Prevention
Author:
Saini PoojaORCID, Hunt Anna, Blaney PeterORCID, Murray Annie
Abstract
AbstractThe cost of one suicide is estimated to be £1.67 million (2 million euros) to the UK economy. Most people who die by suicide have seen a primary care practitioner (PCP) in the year prior to death. PCPs could aim to intervene before suicidal behaviours arise by addressing suicide-risk factors noted in primary care consultations, thereby preventing suicide and promoting health and wellbeing. This study aimed to conduct a rapid, systematic scoping review to explore how PCPs can effectively recognise and respond to suicide-risk factors. MedLine, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched for three key concepts: suicide prevention, mental health and primary care. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full papers independently against the eligibility criteria. Data synthesis was achieved by extracting and analysing study characteristics and findings. Forty-two studies met the eligibility criteria and were cited in this scoping review. Studies were published between 1990 and 2020 and were of good methodological quality. Six themes regarding suicide risk assessment in primary care were identified: Primary care consultations prior to suicide; Reasons for non-disclosure of suicidal behaviour; Screening for suicide risk; Training for primary care staff; Use of language by primary care staff; and, Difference in referral pathways from general practitioners or primary care practitioners. This review focused on better recognition and response to specific suicide-risk factors more widely such as poor mental health, substance misuse and long-term physical health conditions. Primary care is well placed to address the range of suicide-risk factors including biological, physical-health, psychological and socio-economic factors and therefore these findings could inform the development of person-centred approaches to be used in primary care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. Acheson, D. (1988). Public health in England: the report of the Committee of inquiry into the future development of the public health function (pp. 23–34). London: The Stationary Office. 2. *Anderson, H. D., Pace, W. D., Brandt, E., Nielsen, R. D., Allen, R. R., Libby, A. M., West, D. R., & Valuck, R. J. (2015). Monitoring suicidal patients in primary care using electronic health records. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 28(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140181 3. Appleby, L. Kapur, N. Shaw, J. Hunt, I. Ibrahim, S. Gianatsi, M. Turnbull, P. Rodway, C. Tham, S. Burns, J. Richards N. (2018). National confidential inquiry into suicide and homicide–annual report: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. https://documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=38469 4. *Appleby, L., Amos, T., Doyle, U., Tomenson, B., & Woodman, M. (1996). General practitioners and young suicides. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 168(3), 330–333. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.168.3.330 5. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|