Is accumulation risk in cyber methodically underestimated?

Author:

Zeller GabrielaORCID,Scherer Matthias

Abstract

AbstractMany insurers have started to underwrite cyber in recent years. In parallel, they developed their first actuarial models to cope with this new type of risk. On the portfolio level, two major challenges hereby are the adequate modelling of the dependence structure among cyber losses and the lack of suitable data based on which the model is calibrated. The purpose of this article is to highlight the importance of taking a holistic approach to cyber. In particular, we argue that actuarial modelling should not be viewed stand-alone, but rather as an integral part of an interconnected value chain with other processes such as cyber-risk assessment and cyber-claims settlement. We illustrate that otherwise, i.e. if these data-collection processes are not aligned with the actuarial (dependence) model, naïve data collection necessarily leads to a dangerous underestimation of accumulation risk. We illustrate the detrimental effects on the assessment of the dependence structure and portfolio risk by using a simple mathematical model for dependence through common vulnerabilities. The study concludes by highlighting the practical implications for insurers.

Funder

Technische Universität München

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference51 articles.

1. Acerbi C, Tasche D (2002) On the coherence of expected shortfall. J Banking Finance 26(7):1487–1503

2. Advisen (2018) 2018 Cyber Guide: The Ultimate Guide to Cyber Service Providers. Report, available at https://www.advisenltd.com/media/reports/cyber-guide/

3. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (2015) Hurricane Katrina 10. Report, available at https://commercial.allianz.com/news-and-insights/reports/lessons-learned-from-hurricane-katrina.html, August

4. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (2015) A Guide to Cyber Risk: Managing the Impact of Increasing Interconnectivity. Report, available at https://www.agcs.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/agcs/agcs/reports/AGCS-Cyberrisk-report.pdf, September

5. Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9(3):203–228

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3