Abstract
AbstractRapid combustion of fossil fuels in huge quantities resulted in the enormous release of CO2 in the atmosphere. Subsequently, leading to the greenhouse gas effect and climate change and contemporarily, quest and usage of fossil fuels has increased dramatically in recent times. The only solution to resolve the problem of CO2 emissions to the atmosphere is geological/subsurface storage of carbon dioxide or carbon capture and storage (CCS). Additionally, CO2 can be employed in the oil and gas fields for enhanced oil recovery operations and this cyclic form of the carbon dioxide injection into reservoirs for recovering oil and gas is known as CO2 Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery (EOGR). Hence, this paper presents the CO2 retention dominance in tight oil and gas reservoirs in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) of the Alberta Province, Canada. Actually, hysteresis modeling was applied in the oil and gas reservoirs of WCSB for sequestering or trapping CO2 and EOR as well. Totally, four cases were taken for the investigation, such as WCSB Alberta tight oil and gas reservoirs with CO2 huff-n-puff and flooding processes. Actually, Canada has complex geology and therefore, implicate that it can serve as a promising candidate that is suitable and safer place for CO2 storage. Furthermore, injection pressure, time, rate (mass), number of cycles, soaking time, fracture half-length, conductivity, porosity, permeability, and initial reservoir pressure were taken as input parameters and cumulative oil production and oil recovery factor are the output parameters, this is mainly for tight oil reservoirs. In the tight gas reservoirs, only the output parameters differ from the oil reservoir, such as cumulative gas production and gas recovery factor. Reservoirs were modelled to operate for 30 years of oil and gas production and the factor year was designated as decision-making unit (DMU). CO2 retention was estimated in all four models and overall the gas retention in four cases showed a near sinusoidal behavior and the variations are sporadic. More than 80% CO2 retention in these tight formations were achieved and the major influencing factors that govern the CO2 storage in these tight reservoirs are injection pressure, time, mass, number of cycles, and soaking time. In general, the subsurface geology of the Canada is very complex consisting with many structural and stratigraphic layers and thus, it offers safe location for CO2 storage through retention mechanism and increasing the efficiency and reliability of oil and gas extraction from these complicated subsurface formations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Energy,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference80 articles.
1. Abokyi E, Appiah-Konadu P, Abokyi F, Oteng-Abayie EF (2019) Industrial growth and emissions of CO2 in Ghana: the role of financial development and fossil fuel consumption. Energy Reports 5:1339–1353
2. Agada S, Geiger S, Doster F (2016) Wettability, hysteresis and fracture-matrix interaction during CO2 EOR and storage in fractured carbonate reservoirs. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 46:57–75
3. Ahmadinia M, Shariatipour SM, Andersen O, Sadri M (2019) An engineering solution for CO2 injection in saline aquifers. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 53:98–105
4. Ahmed T, McKinney P (2004) Advanced reservoir engineering, 1st edn. Elsevier Science, Burlington
5. Ameyaw B, Yao L, Oppong A, Agyeman JK (2019) Investigating, forecasting and proposing emission mitigation pathways for CO2 emission from fossil fuel combustion only: a case study of selected countries. Energy Policy 130:7–21