Abstract
AbstractIn recent years, China has explored and exploited several high-pressure deep gas fields. Normally, high-pressure gas wells are gathered and processed through multichoke manifolds on well sites, creating hazards such as high wellhead flowing pressure (Pt) and high risk for on-site operation personnel. Moreover, downhole chokes have been used in place of surface chokes. In doing this, the Joule–Thomson (JT) effect is geothermally regulated, alleviating the formation of hydrates in surface facilities. However, its applicability to high-pressure gas wells is less explored. In an effort to guide its use, the objective of this study is to set selection criteria in terms of the allowable wellhead Pt and gas flow rate. First, isenthalpic lines are separately estimated for dry gas and high liquid hydrocarbon (LHC) content gas condensate at various inlet temperatures with the use of commercial software. Next, by analysis of the resulting isenthalpic curves, several results are obtained on the JT inversion curves and throttling process through a choke. Third, building on these insights, a method for projecting the maximum Pt is presented, leading to a value of 52.5 MPa. Finally, multiparameter models are separately run for two deep gas wells (8100 m and 5000 m), reinforcing the result of the pressure upper limit while maintaining a maximum daily gas production of 14 E4 m3. Both upper limits with a maximum Pt of 52.5 MPa and daily gas production of 14 E4 m3 are corroborated with field data records. These findings are vital to the selection of a viable high-pressure gas well for applying the downhole throttling technique.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Abad ARB, Ghorbani H, Mohamadian N et al (2022) Robust hybrid machine learning algorithms for gas flow rates prediction through wellhead chokes in gas condensate fields. Fuel 308:121872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121872
2. Agwu OE, Okoro EE, Sanni SE (2022) Modelling oil and gas flow rate through chokes: a critical review of extant models. J Petrol Sci Eng 208:109775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109775
3. AlAjmi MD, Alarifi SA, Mahsoon AH (2015) Improving multiphase choke performance prediction and well production test validation using artificial intelligence: a new milestone. In: SPE digital energy conference and exhibition, Spe-173394-ms
4. Bendlksen KH, Malnes D, Moe R et al (1991) The dynamic two-fluid model OLGA: theory and application. SPE Prod Eng 6(02):171–180. https://doi.org/10.2118/19451-pa
5. Bigdeli A, Lima IDCM, Sepehrnoori K et al. (2019) Development of a novel framework for sequential coupling of reservoir, wells, and surface facilities. In: CILAMCE 2019 Proceedings of the XL Ibero-Latin-American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering, ABMEC Natal/RN, Brazil, November 11–14. http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/61727