Optimum tubing size prediction model for vertical multiphase flow during flow production period of oil wells

Author:

Nwanwe C. C.ORCID,Duru U. I.,Nwanwe O. I.,Chikwe A. O.,Ojiabo K. T.,Umeojiakor C. T.

Abstract

AbstractOptimum tubing size (OTS) selection was traditionally done by using nodal analysis to perform sensitivity analysis on the different tubing sizes. This approach was found to be both cumbersome and time-consuming. This study developed a user-friendly and time-efficient OTS prediction computer model that could allow Petroleum Production Engineers to select the best tubing size for any vertical oil well. The tubing size selection was based on the present operating flow rate, economic considerations and future operating flow rate as defined by the OTS selection criteria of this study. The robustness of the model was tested using tubing sizes ranging from 0.824 to 6.0 inch in a vertical well producing from both saturated and undersaturated oil reservoirs. The 2.750-inch tubing was found the OTS for both scenarios. In the validation, the results obtained from the novel OTS prediction model and Guo et al. (Petroleum production engineering: a computer-assisted approach, Gulf Professional Publishing, Cambridge) spreadsheet program using the Poetmann–Carpenter method were in excellent agreement for operating flow rate but not for operating pressure. Furthermore, the novel OTS prediction model was in excellent agreement with the same spreadsheet program based on modified Hagedorn–Brown correlation for both operating flow rate and pressure. The results showed that the model developed in this study is reliable and can be used in the field for vertical oil wells. The new model could as well inform the Production Engineer when the well would need artificial lift for economic production of the well. It was recommended that Newton–Raphson and modified Hagedorn–Brown methods be used in future study.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Energy,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference32 articles.

1. Agboola SO, Appah D, Boniface OA (2016) A comparative analysis of pressure gradient models for vertical multiphase flow in producing oil wells in Niger Delta. Int J Sci Eng Res 7(5):604–620

2. Bendakhlia H, Aziz K (1989) Inflow performance relationships for solution-gas drive horizontal wells. In: 64th annual technical conference and exhibition of the society of petroleum engineers. Society of Petroleum Engineers, San Antonio, Texas, pp. 551–560

3. Brill JP, Beggs HD (1974) Two-phase flow in pipes, University of Tulsa. INTERCOMP Course, The Hague

4. Chang M-M (1992) Analysis of inflow performance simulation of solution-gas drive for horizontal/Slant/Vertical wells. In SPE rocky mountain regional meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Casper, Myoming, pp. 369–378

5. Cicchitti A, Lombardi C, Silvestri M, Soldaini G, Zavattarelli R (1960) Two-phase cooling experiments—pressure drop, heat transfer and burnout measurements. Energ Nucl 7(6):407–425

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3