Patient activation and health literacy in Dutch patients with multiple involved specialties

Author:

Dijkstra HiddeORCID,Weil Liann I.,Vermeeren Y.,Verhoeff M.,van Munster Barbara C.

Abstract

Abstract Aim To examine the association between having a higher number of involved specialties, patient activation (PA), and health literacy (HL) in patients visiting a general hospital. Subject and methods Patients ≥ 18 years of age who had an appointment with the medical specialist or physician assistant were asked to participate in this study. Patients completed the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM) questionnaire and the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). They were stratified into having < 3 or ≥ 3 involved medical specialties in the past 12 months. Two association models were built to examine the association. Results This study included 200 patients with 52% males (n = 104), a median age of 65 years, and low levels of education (67%). Patients with ≥ 3 involved medical specialties (58%) had lower total PAM scores (p = 0.03) and had lower HLS-EU-Q index scores (p = 0.23). The multivariable regression analysis showed that having ≥ 3 involved medical specialties was not associated with low PAM scores (OR = 1.59, p = 0.13) when adjusted for low education, low HLS-EU-Q scores, and higher age (> 65 years). In addition, having ≥ 3 involved medical specialties was not associated with low HLS-EU-Q scores (OR = 1.10, p = 0.76) when adjusted for low PAM scores and low education. Conclusion Patients with ≥ 3 involved medical specialties visiting the internal medicine department of a general (non-academic) hospital had variable levels of PA and HL. Moreover, having ≥ 3 involved medical specialties was not significantly associated with lower PA and HL. Importantly, the number of involved specialties may not be a proxy for recognizing low PA and HL. Organizations aiming to improve PA and HL could measure these constructs directly.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3