Abstract
AbstractContemporary educational theory and practice increasingly emphasise the importance of integrated education in creating the conditions for success for primary school students. In Lithuania, as part of the 2020–2024 curriculum update and the development of general curricula, integrated education is highlighted as one of the priorities for achieving harmony between pupils’ academic achievements and the development of general competences, as well as the creation of a favourable emotional environment for pupils. This creates a strategic perspective on the content of education. However, there is a lack of research and insights into how such practices can be developed smoothly. For this reason, our research was carried out by targeting one of the Francophone institutes in southern France, which has successfully implemented an integrated education practice that enables learning for every pupil in the primary grades. The study analysed the context, i.e. the concept of the educational institution’s activities, which shows what should be done and how it should be done in order to achieve the quality of integrated education. In addition, the data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with 4 teachers at the Institute with experience in integrated education. Qualitative content analysis was used to inductively search for answers describing the essence of integrated education, the most important processes to reflect on before engaging with pupils, and to deductively identify how certain elements contribute to creating the conditions conducive to integrated education and pupils’ successful learning.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,General Social Sciences,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education
Reference61 articles.
1. Acree, L., Gibson, T., Mangum, N., Wolf, M. A., Kellogg, S., & Branon, S. (2017). Supporting school leaders in blended learning with blended learning. Journal of Online Learning Research, 3(2), 105–143.
2. Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion (1st ed.). Routledge.
3. Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2018). Reasons for teachers’ successful development of a formative assessment practice through professional development: A motivation perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(6), 576–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1430685
4. Arrow, A., Braid, C., & Chapman, J. (2019). Explicit linguistic knowledge is necessary, but not sufficient, for the provision of explicit early literacy instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 69, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-00168-0
5. Azis, A. (2015). Conceptions and practices of assessment: A case of teachers representing improvement conception. TEFLIN Journal, 26(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/129-154
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献