Abstract
AbstractCantor argued that absolute infinity is beyond mathematical comprehension. His arguments imply that the domain of mathematics cannot be grasped by mathematical means. We argue that this inability constitutes a foundational problem. For Cantor, however, the domain of mathematics does not belong to mathematics, but to theology. We thus discuss the theological significance of Cantor’s treatment of absolute infinity and show that it can be interpreted in terms of negative theology. Proceeding from this interpretation, we refer to the recent debate on absolute generality and argue that the method of diagonalization constitutes a modern version of the vianegativa. On our reading, negative theology can evoke an attitude of humility with respect to the boundedness of the human condition. Along these lines, we think that the foundational problem of mathematics concerning its domain can be addressed through a methodological attitude of humility.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference90 articles.
1. Aberdein, A., Rittberg, C.J., & Tanswell, F.S. (Eds.). (2021). Virtue theory of mathematical practices. Topical collection of Synthese.
2. Armstrong, D. M. (2004). Truth and truthmakers. Cambridge University Press.
3. Baker, A. (2007). Is there a problem of induction for mathematics? In M. Leng, A. C. Paseau, & M. Potter (Eds.), Mathematical Knowledge (pp. 57–71). Oxford University Press.
4. Bandmann, H. (1992). Die Unendlichkeit des Seins. Cantors transfinite Mengenlehre und ihre metaphysischen Wurzeln. Peter Lang.
5. Becker, O. (1973). Mathematische Existenz. Untersuchungen zur Logik und Ontologie mathematischer Phänomene. Niemeyer.