On imperfective suffixes in Russian

Author:

Biskup PetrORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis article is concerned with imperfective suffixes in Russian. It argues that there are at least three imperfective suffixes, the progressive morpheme, the iterative marker and the habitual suffix. It is shown that they differ in morphosyntactic and semantic properties. As to their structural properties, the progressive suffix is the lowest marker; the iterative morpheme attaches in a higher position; and the habitual morpheme is structurally the highest element. Thus, the article argues against a unitary approach to the iterative suffix and the habitual morpheme. Semantically, the iterative suffix has a pluractional meaning, whereas the habitual suffix is a vague generic quantifier. As to their phonological properties, the three markers are homophonous; they are spelled out as an -yva- allomorph. In this respect, the suffixes differ from the morphological aspect operator encoding (im)perfectivity in the aspectual head, which is phonologically empty. Further, it is shown that there are certain prefixes in the verbal morphosyntactic structure that are placed between the progressive projection and the iterative projection.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Universität Leipzig

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference74 articles.

1. Altshuler, D. (2014). A typology of partitive aspectual operators. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, 732–775.

2. Bertinetto, P. M., & Lenci, A. (2012). Habituality, pluractionality, and imperfectivity. In R. I. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect (pp. 852–880). Oxford University Press.

3. Biskup, P. (2023). Aspect separated from aspectual markers in Russian and Czech. In P. Biskup, M. Börner, O. Mueller-Reichau, & I. Shcherbina (Eds.), Advances in formal Slavic linguistics 2021 (pp. 61–98). Language Science Press.

4. Biskup, P. (in press). Delimitatives, diminutive-iteratives and the secondary imperfective in North Slavic. In B. Gehrke, D. Lenertová, R. Meyer, D. Seres, L. Szucsich, & J. Zaleska (Eds.), Advances in formal Slavic linguistics 2022. Language Science Press.

5. Boneh, N., & Doron, E. (2010). Modal and temporal aspects of habituality. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, & I. Sichel (Eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure (pp. 338–363). Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3