Abstract
AbstractLandslide early warning systems (LEWS) can be categorized into two groups: territorial and local systems. Territorial landslide early warning systems (Te-LEWS) deal with the occurrence of several landslides in wide areas: at municipal/regional/national scale. The aim of such systems is to forecast the increased probability of landslide occurrence in a given warning zone. The performance evaluation of such systems is often overlooked, and a standardized procedure is still missing. This paper describes a new Excel user-friendly tool for the application of the EDuMaP method, originally proposed by (Calvello and Piciullo 2016). A description of indicators used for the performance evaluation of different Te-LEWS is provided, and the most useful ones have been selected and implemented into the tool. The EDuMaP tool has been used for the performance evaluation of the “SMART” warning model operating in Piemonte region, Italy. The analysis highlights the warning zones with the highest performance and the ones that need threshold refinement. A comparison of the performance of the SMART model with other models operating in different Te-LEWS has also been carried out, highlighting critical issues and positive aspects. Lastly, the SMART performance has been evaluated with both the EDuMaP and a standard 2 × 2 contingency table for comparison purposes. The result highlights that the latter approach can lead to an imprecise and not detailed assessment of the warning model, because it cannot differentiate among the levels of warning and the variable number of landslides that may occur in a time interval.
Funder
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference28 articles.
1. Bazin S (Ed.) (2012) SafeLand deliverable 4.8. Guidelines for landslide monitoring and early warning systems in Europe – design and required technology. European Project SafeLand, Grant Agreement No. 226479, Deliverable 4.8, 153 pp., available at: http://www.safeland-fp7.eu, 2012 https://www.ngi.no/eng/Projects/SafeLand (Last access: Apr 2017)
2. Calvello M (2017) Early warning strategies to cope with landslide risk. Rivista italiana di geotecnica 2/2017, 63–91. Patron editore. doi: https://doi.org/10.19199/2017.2.0557-1405.063
3. Calvello M, Piciullo L (2016) Assessing the performance of regional landslide early warning models: the EDuMaP method. Nat Hazards Earth Syst 16:103–122. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-103-2016
4. Calvello M, d’Orsi R, Piciullo L, Paes NM, Magalhaes MA, Coelho R, Lacerda WA (2015) The community-based alert and alarm system for rainfall induced landslides in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, In: Engineering geology for society and territory “landslide processes”, Proc. XII Int. IAEG Congress, Torino, Italy, 2, 653–657, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_(1)09
5. Cheung PY, Wong MC, Yeung HY (2006) Application of rainstorm Nowcast to realtime warning of landslide hazards in Hong Kong. In: WMO PWS Workshop onWarnings of Real-Time Hazards by Using Nowcasting Technology, Sydney, Australia, 9–13 October 2006
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献