A Qualitative Approach to Conceptual Spaces: Prototypes as Qualitative Atoms

Author:

Belastegui JavierORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this paper is to propose a qualitative approach to the theory of conceptual spaces, in contrast to the usual metric framework. This requires qualitative notions of similarity, simple concepts, prototypes and conceptual categorisation. For this purpose, I will introduce three mathematical models for conceptual spaces. The first one is topological and has been proposed by Mormann. The other two are new and are based on atomistic orders and similarity relations. I will discuss how each of them deals with the Design Principles proposed by Douven and Gärdenfors and with further Adequacy Conditions. Despite being apparently different, I will show that these three models are mathematically equivalent. Finally, I will address three objections to the present approach. The first one says that the qualitative notion of a prototype is a bad analogue of the metric one. The second one suggests that, in contrast to the Voronoi construction, the function qualitatively representing the conceptual categorisation process is arbitrary. The last one appeals to Goodman’s companionship and imperfect community problems to show that there is a flaw in defining simple concepts from similarity relations.

Funder

Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

Basque Government, Department of Education

UPV/EHU

Universidad del País Vasco

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Logic,Philosophy

Reference25 articles.

1. Benedetto, M. D. (2020). Explicating ‘explication’ via conceptual spaces. Erkenntnis, 1–37.

2. Brockhaus, K. (1963). Untersuchungen zu Carnaps Logischem Aufbau der Welt. Dissertation, Universität Münster.

3. Carnap, R. (1923). Die Quasizerlegung: Ein Verfahren zur Ordnung nichthomogener Mengen mit den Mitteln der Beziehungslehre. Unpublished manuscript RC-081-04-01.

4. Carnap, R. (1967). The logical structure of the world. University of California Press.

5. Davey, B. A., & Priestly, H. A. (2012). Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3