Abstract
AbstractKenneth Silver has recently argued that backwards causation is common in the context of social institutions. I consider this claim in detail and conclude that backwards causation is not the most plausible interpretation of what is going on in the cases Silver considers. Nonetheless, I show that these cases can teach us some interesting lessons about institutional facts. In particular, I argue that in order to avoid contradiction due to conflicting declarations in these cases, we must conclude that the properties involved in institutional facts are relational properties.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Abbruzzese, J. (2001). On using the multiverse to avoid the paradoxes of time travel. Analysis, 61(1), 36–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/61.1.36.
2. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). On brute facts. Analysis, 18(3), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/18.3.69.
3. Barlassina, L., & Del Prete, F. (2015). The puzzle of the changing past. Analysis, 75(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anu105.
4. Brier, B. (1973). Magicians, alarm clocks, and backward causation. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 11(4), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1973.tb01151.x.
5. Clarín.com. (2017, February 24). Maradona dijo que no se disculpó a los ingleses. Clarín Ultimo Momento. Retrieved July 31, 2023 from https://www.clarin.com/ultimo-momento/maradona-dijo-disculpo-ingleses_0_r1i-bNC0ate.html.