Author:
Lukovics Miklós,Udvari Beáta,Nádas Nikoletta,Fisher Erik
Abstract
AbstractAcross the globe, research, development, and innovation (RDI) processes are operating at increasingly accelerated paces, promising rapid development and higher standards of living, but also increasing the likelihood of unintended, socially undesirable effects that inevitably attend progress. The notion of responsible research and innovation (RRI) has emerged in response to this dilemma, and the integration of RRI into daily RDI practices itself represents a considerable challenge. Integrating RRI concepts and practices at an early or even pre-career stage, before researchers fully develop their daily routines, could strengthen the assimilation of RRI into RDI more generally. Thus, in line with the emphasis of RRI on science education, how to integrate RRI aspects in the thinking of researchers-in-the-making before they start their active research carrier is an important but under-investigated question. In addition, the special features of Generation Z currently being in higher education suggest the use nontraditional tools in science education.Accordingly, this exploratory study asks how the RRI-awareness of researchers-in-the-making can be raised. We adapt the Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) method, which facilitates reflection on societal aspects during scientific research practices and decisions, to the context of science education. We test the introduction of STIR among researchers-in-the-making studying natural sciences at the University of Szeged (Hungary). Our findings suggest potential steps for science education on RRI with attention to the special needs Generation Z and facilitating their RRI awareness for their active researcher career.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference76 articles.
1. Adam, B., & Groves, G. (2011). Futures tended: care and future-oriented responsibility. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 31(1), 17–27.
2. Ahrwiler, P., Gilbert, N., Schrempf, B., Grimpe, B., & Jirotka, M. (2019). The role of civil society organisations in European responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(1), 25–49.
3. Arentshorst, M. E., de Cock Buning, T., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2016). Exploring responsible innovation: Dutch public perceptions of the future of medical neuroimaging technology. Technology in Society, 45(May 2016), 8–18.
4. Arnaldi, S., Quaglio, G., Ladikas, M., O'Kane, H., Karapiperis, T., Srinivas, K. R., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Responsible governance in science and technology policy: reflections from Europe, China and India. Technology in Society, 42(August 2015), 81–92.
5. Ballas, D. & Lupton, R. & Kavroudakis, D. & Hennig, B. & Yiagopoulou, V. & Dale, R., & Dorling, D. (2012): Mind the gap: education inequality across EU regions. NESSE Network of Experts for the European Commission: Brussels, Belgium.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献