Abstract
AbstractA systematic review was conducted to examine expected economic outcomes of rubber-based agroforestry systems during mature rubber stage in comparison with monoculture rubber farming. Twelve studies were identified for a narrative synthesis of economic outcomes of the mature rubber production systems. The review found that whilst monoculture rubber production may produce higher income in some cases, particularly when rubber prices are high, profitable diversified rubber agroforestry systems were reported in all but one study. Rubber agroforestry has the potential to reduce the vulnerability of smallholders to volatile markets for rubber, particularly if the share of income from secondary species is substantial. Shade-tolerant crops with small canopies (e.g. coffee, bamboo and tea) are reported as ideal intercrops for rubber. Economically advantageous systems reported appeared to be rubber combined with species which provide additional income in the medium to long term (e.g. sheep and high value timber) and/or enhance ongoing cash flow with a lengthy productive lifespan and regular harvests (e.g. durian and gnetum). However, these systems are subject to many constraints such as labour availability, investment and management capacity and market conditions for secondary products. The review showed an absence of farm portfolio studies aimed at finding risk reducing enterprise combinations. Future research on economic outcomes of rubber agroforestry systems should firstly distinguish traditional jungle rubber from rubber agroforestry systems which use clonal rubber similar to those used in monoculture rubber, and secondly consider the full value of secondary products even if they are grown for own consumption.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Forestry
Reference48 articles.
1. Anderson JR, Dillon JL, Hardaker JB (1977) Agricultural decision analysis. Iowa State University Press, Ames
2. Andriesse E, Tanwattana P (2018) Coping with the end of the commodities boom: rubber smallholders in Southern Thailand oscillating between near-poverty and middle-class status. J Dev Soc 34(1):77–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X17752420
3. Barrett CB, Reardon T, Webb P (2001) Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy 26:315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00014-8
4. *Charernjiratragul S, Palakorn S, Romyen A (2014) Economic analysis of the green area expansion in rubber plantation. Research project - agricultural policy and research and strengthening policy supported by the Thailand Research Fund
5. Chen C, Liu W, Wu J, Jiang X, Zhu X (2019) Can intercropping with the cash crop help improve the soil physico-chemical properties of rubber plantations? Geoderma 335: 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.023
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献