Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Early detection of tumor treatment responses represents an unmet clinical need with no approved noninvasive methods. DAB4, or its chimeric derivative, chDAB4 (APOMAB®) is an antibody that targets the Lupus associated antigen (La/SSB). La/SSB is over-expressed in malignancy and selectively targeted by chDAB4 in cancer cells dying from DNA-damaging treatment. Therefore, chDAB4 is a unique diagnostic tool that detects dead cancer cells and thus could distinguish between treatment responsive and nonresponsive patients.
Procedures
In clinically relevant tumor models, mice bearing subcutaneous xenografts of human ovarian or lung cancer cell lines or intraperitoneal ovarian cancer xenografts were untreated or given chemotherapy followed 24h later by chDAB4 radiolabeled with [89Zr]ZrIV. Tumor responses were monitored using bioluminescence imaging and caliper measurements. [89Zr]Zr-chDAB4 uptake in tumor and normal tissues was measured using an Albira SI Positron-Emission Tomography (PET) imager and its biodistribution was measured using a Hidex gamma-counter.
Results
Tumor uptake of [89Zr]Zr-chDAB4 was detected in untreated mice, and uptake significantly increased in both human lung and ovarian tumors after chemotherapy, but not in normal tissues.
Conclusion
Given that tumors, rather than normal tissues, were targeted after chemotherapy, these results support the clinical development of chDAB4 as a radiodiagnostic imaging agent and as a potential predictive marker of treatment response.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Ray and Shirl Norman Cancer Research Trust
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology
Reference64 articles.
1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247
2. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50:122S–150S
3. Peacock JG, Christensen CT, Banks KP (2019) RESISTing the need to quantify: putting qualitative FDG-PET/CT tumor response assessment criteria into daily practice. Am J Neuroradiol 40:1978–1986
4. Gallamini A, Zwarthoed C, Borra A (2014) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology. Cancers 6:1821–1889
5. Gerke O, Ehlers K, Motschall E, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Vach W (2020) PET/CT-Based response evaluation in cancer—a systematic review of design issues. Mol Imaging Biol 22:33–46
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献