Abstract
AbstractHow can we have a sense of the presence of ordinary three-dimensional objects (e.g., an apple on my desk, a partially occluded cat behind a picket fence) when we are only presented with some parts of objects perceived from a particular egocentric viewpoint (e.g., the facing side of the apple, the unoccluded parts of the cat)? This paper presents and defends a novel answer to this question by incorporating insights from two prominent contemporary theories of perception, naïve realism and sensorimotor theory. Naïve realism is the view that perception is fundamentally a matter of obtaining a relation of ‘acquaintance’ with some mind-independent entities (e.g., objects, properties, events). Sensorimotor theory holds that perception involves implicit practical understanding or ‘anticipation’ of the covariance between movements and sensory changes. I argue that perceptual presence is best accounted for in terms of the combination of our direct ‘acquaintance’ with some parts of perceived objects and sensorimotor ‘anticipations’ of how the objects would look different depending on some movements and actions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Allen, K. (2009). Being coloured and looking coloured. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39(4), 647–670.
2. Allen, K. (2016). A naive realist theory of colour. Oxford University Press.
3. Allen, K. (2019). Merleau-Ponty and naive realism. Philosophers’ Imprint, 19, 1–25.
4. Bayne, T., & Montague, M. (Eds.). (2011). Cognitive phenomenology. Oxford University Press.
5. Beaton, M. (2016). Sensorimotor direct realism: How we enact our world. Constructivist Foundations, 11(2), 265–276.