Abstract
AbstractTo analyse contingent propositions, this paper investigates how branching time structures can be combined with probability theory. In particular, it considers assigning infinitesimal probabilities—available in non-Archimedean probability theory—to individual histories. This allows us to introduce the concept of ‘remote possibility’ as a new modal notion between ‘impossibility’ and ‘appreciable possibility’. The proposal is illustrated by applying it to a future contingent and a historical counterfactual concerning an infinite sequence of coin tosses. The latter is a toy model that is used to illustrate the applicability of the proposal to more realistic physical models.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Adams, E. (1965). The logic of conditionals. Inquiry, 8, 166–197.
2. Adams, E. (1970). Subjunctive and indicative conditionals. Foundations of Language, 6, 89–94.
3. Beall, J., Restall, G., & Sagi, Gil. (2019). Logical consequence. In E. N. Zalta, (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/logical-consequence/
4. Beatty, J. (2006). Replaying life’s tape. Journal of Philosophy, 103, 336–362. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103716
5. Belnap, N., & Müller, T. (2010). Branching with uncertain semantics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axq001