Abstract
AbstractIs conceptual engineering feasible? Answering that question requires a theory of semantic change, which is sometimes thought elusive. Fortunately, much is known about semantic change as it occurs in the wild. While usage is chaotic and complex, changes in a word’s use can produce changes in its meaning. There are several under-appreciated empirical constraints on how meanings change that stem from the following observation: word use finely reflects equilibrium between various communicative pressures (just as, say, product sales do between various market pressures). Much of the relevant work in linguistics has employed the methods of empirical pragmatics and diachronic semantics. In this way, the study of meaning change can be brought to bear on the conceptual engineer’s normative project. The picture that emerges tells against the sorts of engineering projects most likely to appeal to philosophers. Some may stand to succeed, but they have significantly different contours than the typical ones.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference63 articles.
1. Barnes, E. (2016). The minority body: A theory of disability. Oxford University Press.
2. Blank, A. (1999). Why do new meanings occUR? In A. Blank & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition. Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Blank, A., & Koch, P. (1999). Historical semantics and cognition. Mouton De Gruyter.
4. Blutner, R. (2000). Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 17(3), 189–216.
5. Bréal, M. (1900). Semantics: Studies in the science of meaning. Translated from original by N. Cust. London: William Heinemann.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献