Author:
Bauer Katharina,Hermann Julia
Abstract
AbstractIn today’s highly dynamic societies, moral norms and values are subject to change. Moral change is partly driven by technological developments. For instance, the introduction of robots in elderly care practices requires caregivers to share moral responsibility with a robot (see van Wynsberghe 2013). Since we do not know what elements of morality will change and how they will change (see van der Burg 2003), moral education should aim at fostering what has been called “moral resilience” (Swierstra 2013). We seek to fill two gaps in the existing literature: (i) research on moral education has not paid enough attention to the development of moral resilience; (ii) the very limited literature on moral resilience does not conceptualise moral resilience in relation to new technological developments. We argue that philosophical accounts of moral education need to do justice to the importance of moral resilience, and that a specific form of moral resilience should be conceptualised as “technomoral resilience” to underline the added value of cultivating moral resilience in relation to technomoral change. We illustrate the role of technomoral resilience in practice by looking at the context of elderly care. To make the first step towards an account of how technomoral resilience can be fostered in moral education, we propose that moral education shall focus on a triangle of capacities: (1) moral imagination, (2) a capacity for critical reflection, and (3) a capacity for maintaining one’s moral agency in the face of disturbances.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Philosophy
Reference64 articles.
1. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2021) The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials
2. Annas J (2011) Intelligent Virtue. Oxford University Press, New York
3. Baker R (2019) The structure of moral revolution: studies of changes in the morality of abortion, death, and the bioethics revolution. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA
4. Bauer K (2022) ‘Do not make yourself a worm’: reconsidering dignity as a duty to oneself. In: Sarat A, Pele A, Riley S (eds) Human dignity (studies in Law, Politics, and Society, vol 88. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720220000088002
5. Boenink M, Swierstra T, Stemerding D (2010) Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: a scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Stud Ethics Law Technol 4/2:1–38. https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1098
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献