Abstract
AbstractPsychoeducation programs may increase knowledge about stress and help adolescents cope with stress. However, research about the effectiveness of psychoeducation programs about stress for adolescents is limited. The present study aimed to fill this gap by evaluating the effect of a brief school-based universal psychoeducation program about stress, the Stress Lessons, in terms of knowledge and experienced stress. A total of 1613 adolescents (M = 13.41 years) from Dutch secondary schools participated. A cluster randomised controlled design was employed: classes were randomly assigned to an experimental or control condition. The experimental condition received three Stress Lessons between pre- and post-test. The Stress Lessons provided information about stress, how to recognize stress, and how to cope with and prevent stress. Questionnaires were used to assess knowledge about stress as well as experienced stress. Multilevel analyses were conducted to examine the effectiveness of the Stress Lessons and the moderating effect of gender, educational track, and ethnic background. Results showed that knowledge gain was significantly greater in the experimental than in the control condition. Experienced stress did not change due to the Stress Lessons. Moderator analyses revealed a larger effect of the Stress lessons in terms of knowledge about stress for girls compared to boys and for adolescents who followed academic compared to vocational education. Overall, the findings show that a brief psychoeducation program leads to a better understanding of stress. Therefore, it may be useful for schools to implement such programs to enhance adolescents’ awareness.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Anniko, M. K., Boersma, K., van Wijk, N. P. L., Byrne, D., & Tillfors, M. (2018). Development of a shortened version of the adolescent stress questionnaire (ASQ-S): Construct validity and sex invariance in a large sample of Swedish adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, 6(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2018-001.
2. Arrindell, W. A. (2001). Changes in waiting-list patients over time: Data on some commonly-used measures. Beware! Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39(10), 1227–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00104-2.
3. Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory (Second Edition). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
4. Burchard, E. G., Ziv, E., Coyle, N., Gomez, S. L., Tang, H., Karter, A. J., et al. (2003). The importance of race and Ethnic Background in Biomedical Research and Clinical Practice. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348(12), 1170–1175. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb025007.
5. Central Bureau of Statistics (2019). Inkomensverdeling per postcodegebied (PC4), 2017. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/maatwerk/2019/50/inkomensverdeling-per-postcodegebied--pc4---2017