Abstract
Abstract
Background
Presentation to the emergency department (ED) with self-harm provides an important opportunity for intervention.
Aims
To investigate characteristics and self-harm repetition risk of those discharged from the ED without a referral for mental health–related aftercare.
Method
Data on consecutive self-harm presentations to EDs for the years 2013–2019 (n = 55,770) were obtained from the National Self-Harm Registry Ireland. Multilevel Poisson and Cox regression models were estimated.
Results
Half of the self-harm presenters were discharged from the ED (49.8%) and almost half of them did not receive a mental health–related referral (46.8%). Receipt of a psychosocial assessment was associated with a 50% reduced risk of non-referral (IRR 0.54; 95% CI 0.51–0.57). Non-referral was also less likely for young people (< 18 years), presentations involving attempted hanging, persons with previous self-harm presentations, and in the latter half of the study period (2017–2019 vs. 2013–2016), but was more likely for those brought by ambulance, presenting outside 9 am–5 pm and admitted to an ED medical assessment unit. Of those not referred, 19.3% had a repeat presentation within 12 months, compared to 22.4% of those referred. No difference in repetition risk between these two groups was evident in adjusted analyses. Self-harm history had the strongest association with repetition, with highest risk among individuals with four or more previous presentations (HR 9.30, 95% CI 8.14–10.62).
Conclusions
The findings underline the importance of assessing all individuals who present with self-harm and highlight the need for comprehensively resourced 24hr services providing mental health care in the ED.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Carroll R, Metcalfe C, Gunnell D (2014) Hospital presenting self-harm and risk of fatal and non-fatal repetition: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9(2):e89944
2. NICE (2022) Self-harm: assessment, management and preventing recurrence [NICE guideline NG225]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng225/resources/selfharm-assessment-management-and-preventing-recurrence-pdf-66143837346757. Accessed 29 May 2024
3. Arensman E, Griffin E, Daly C et al (2018) Recommended next care following hospital-treated self-harm: patterns and trends over time. PLoS ONE 13(3):e0193587
4. Griffin E, Gunnell D, Corcoran P (2020) Factors explaining variation in recommended care pathways following hospital-presenting self-harm: a multilevel national registry study. BJPsych Open 6(6). https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.116
5. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK) (2004) Self-Harm: The Short-Term Physical and Psychological Management and Secondary Prevention of Self-Harm in Primary and Secondary Care. Leicester (UK): British Psychological Society (UK). PMID: 21834185