Abstract
AbstractThe objective of this article is to carry out a review of the links between institutional and post-Keynesian economics, in order to raise the possible compatibility and even complementarity between the two branches of economic thought. To this end, we first review the question of compatibility from the perspective of institutional economics and then from the post-keynesian standpoint. Next, methodological issues are addressed by presenting the essential elements that characterize post-keynesian and institutional methodology (and internal debates in this regard) and then by describing the areas of compatibility between the two. The final section presents the main conclusions and summarizes the basic elements that could constitute a theoretical framework of synthesis between institutional and post-keynesian economics.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Finance
Reference154 articles.
1. Archer, M. (1998). Realism and morphogenesis. In. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: essential readings (pp. 356–381). London: Routledge.
2. Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Arestis, P. (1992). The Post-Keynesian Approach to Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
4. Arestis, P. (1996). Post-keynesian economics: towards coherence. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20(1), 111–135.
5. Arestis, P., Dunn, S. P., & Sawyer, M. (1999a). On the coherence of Post-Keynesian Economics: a comment on Walters and Young. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 46(3), 339–345.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献