Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology

Author:

Fernández-Huerga EduardoORCID,Pardo AnaORCID,Salvador AnaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this article is to carry out a review of the links between institutional and post-Keynesian economics, in order to raise the possible compatibility and even complementarity between the two branches of economic thought. To this end, we first review the question of compatibility from the perspective of institutional economics and then from the post-keynesian standpoint. Next, methodological issues are addressed by presenting the essential elements that characterize post-keynesian and institutional methodology (and internal debates in this regard) and then by describing the areas of compatibility between the two. The final section presents the main conclusions and summarizes the basic elements that could constitute a theoretical framework of synthesis between institutional and post-keynesian economics.

Funder

Universidad de León

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Finance

Reference154 articles.

1. Archer, M. (1998). Realism and morphogenesis. In. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: essential readings (pp. 356–381). London: Routledge.

2. Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Arestis, P. (1992). The Post-Keynesian Approach to Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

4. Arestis, P. (1996). Post-keynesian economics: towards coherence. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20(1), 111–135.

5. Arestis, P., Dunn, S. P., & Sawyer, M. (1999a). On the coherence of Post-Keynesian Economics: a comment on Walters and Young. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 46(3), 339–345.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3