Author:
Berchtold Claudia,Vollmer Maike,Sendrowski Philip,Neisser Florian,Müller Larissa,Grigoleit Sonja
Abstract
AbstractDisaster response actors are facing new challenges, which encompass not only new and ever more complex threats but also the need to collaborate across organizational boundaries and even state borders. Depending on scale, these interactions have to work across governance setups, political and legal conditions, organizational cultures, as well as personal preferences and experiences that vary among actors, organizations, and countries. But which concrete measures are taken by crisis management actors at different scales to bridge these challenges and which of these could serve others as example to address comparable challenges in their contexts? This study made attempts to analyze whether certain solutions across organizations and states exist that facilitate effective interorganizational crisis management in the member states of the European Union (EU). It is based on selected expert interviews with representatives of different types of disaster response organizations (health services, police services, fire services, and other crisis management organizations) from seven EU member states (Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, Austria, and Greece).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Safety Research,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference37 articles.
1. Ansell, C., and A. Boin. 2019. Taming deep uncertainty: The potential of pragmatist principles for understanding and improving strategic crisis management. Administration & Society 51(7): 1079.
2. Balcik, B., and B.M. Beamon. 2008. Facility location in humanitarian relief. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 11(2): 101.
3. Beighley, M., and A.C. Hyde. 2018. Portugal wildfire management in a new era: Assessing fire risks, resources and reforms. Independent Report. https://www.isa.ulisboa.pt/files/cef/pub/articles/2018-04/2018_Portugal_Wildfire_Management_in_a_New_Era_Engish.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2020.
4. BMI (Bundesministerium des Innern/Federal Ministry of the Interior). 2015. System of crisis management in Germany (System des Krisenmanagements in Deutschland). https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/themen/bevoelkerungsschutz/krisenmanagement-in-deutschland.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1. Accessed 30 Jun 2019 (in German).
5. Boersma, K., P. Wagenaar, and J. Wolbers. 2012. Negotiating the ‘trading zone’. Creating a shared information infrastructure in the Dutch public safety sector. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 9(2): Article 785.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献