Development and Validation of the Inventory of Meditation Experiences (IME)
-
Published:2024-06
Issue:6
Volume:15
Page:1429-1442
-
ISSN:1868-8527
-
Container-title:Mindfulness
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Mindfulness
Author:
Van Dam Nicholas T., Targett JessicaORCID, Burger AlexORCID, Davies Jonathan N.ORCID, Galante JulietaORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Meditation is increasingly popular, and yet studies of meditation-related adverse effects, or experiences of unusual psychological states, have mostly focused on those of extremely unpleasant or pleasant nature, respectively, despite the wide range of possible experiences. We aimed to create an instrument to capture meditation-related experiences of varied intensity and subjective valence.
Method
We collected detailed data from 886 US meditators after screening over 3000 individuals to generate a sample representative of major types of meditation practices and experience levels. Participants answered questions about meditation history, mental health, and 103 meditation-related experiences identified for the development of the Inventory of Meditation Experiences (IME).
Results
Parallel analysis guided the eventual determination of factors; exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis yielded good model-to-data fit on a 30-item, 3-factor version of the scale. The total scale and subscales showed expected correlations with measures of adverse effects, meditation characteristics, and mental health symptoms. Analysis indicated utility in examining experience intensity and valence as potentially distinct or combined features of experiences.
Conclusions
The IME is a psychometrically valid tool that may prove useful to assess a variety of meditation-related experiences that account for both the intensity and subjective valence of those experiences.
Preregistration
While several hypotheses were preregistered (https://osf.io/r8beh/), the present study pertains only to the development and validation of the instrument.
Funder
University of Melbourne
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference66 articles.
1. Anderson, K. K., Norman, R., MacDougall, A., Edwards, J., Palaniyappan, L., Lau, C., & Kurdyak, P. (2018). Effectiveness of early psychosis intervention: Comparison of service users and nonusers in population-based health administrative data. American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050480 2. Baer, R., Crane, C., Montero-Marin, J., Phillips, A., Taylor, L., Tickell, A., Kuyken, W., & The MYRIAD team. (2021). Frequency of self-reported unpleasant events and harm in a mindfulness-based program in two general population samples. Mindfulness, 12(3), 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01547-8 3. Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted lest squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modelling, 21(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.859510 4. Berkovich-Ohana, A., & Wittmann, M. (2017). A typology of altered states according to the Consciousness State Space (CSS) model: A special reference to subjective time. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 24(3–4), 37–61. 5. Bovin, M. J., Kimerling, R., Weathers, F. W., Prins, A., Marx, B. P., Post, E. P., & Schnurr, P. P. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of the primary care posttraumatic stress disorder screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) among US veterans. JAMA Network Open, 4(2), e2036733. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36733
|
|