Abstract
ZusammenfassungWhen it comes to corporate crime, recent studies show that bribe givers are usually high-ranking, well-educated, and well-paid managers, which undertake risks in the name of the company and generally orientated toward growing and achieving results as a unit with the company. Until there is some sort of accountability, illegal actions are seen as useful to the organization and themselves. Corporate Crime encompasses the supply-side of corruption, which is associated with a firm’s interaction with the public sector, with cases of grand corruption, in contrast to petty corruption, being the most commonly studied, given its high-profile.
Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Reference71 articles.
1. Almond, P., & van Erp, J. G. (2020). Regulation and governance versus criminology: Disciplinary divides, intersections, and opportunities. Regulation and Governance, 14(2), 167–183.
2. Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Ahmad, N. (2011). An integrated management systems approach to corporate sustainability. European Business Review, 23(4), 353–367.
3. Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research principles, methods and practices. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
4. Bergmann, J. (2016). Corporate Crime, Kriminalitätstheorie und Organisationssoziologie/Corporate crime, criminological theory and sociology of organizations. Monatsschrift Für Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform/Journal of Criminology and Penal Reform, 99. https://doi.org/10.1515/mkr-2016-0503
5. Brasil. (2000). Decreto no. 3.678, de 30 de novembro de 2000. Promulga a Convenção sobre o Combate da Corrupção de Funcionários Públicos Estrangeiros em Transações Comerciais Internacionais, concluída em Paris, em 17 de dezembro de 1997. Diário Oficial da União, December 1. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/d3678.htm