Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Reference85 articles.
1. Aczel, Peter. 1988. Non-well-founded sets. Stanford: CSLI Lectures Notes, vol. 14, Center for the Study of Language and Information. https://urldefense.com/v3/__ https://archive.org/details/nonwellfoundedse0000acze/page/__;!!NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!r7sE6wqgIcXguqiT-j1F9rnrW_Iz-yFPgTyMhf9gVpR1oiYaKZP_-7g9o55FMDfiRzPX4ZbIWC_xo_zLq7q2RzpMpiFgcckV0EWsczJ4ccY$"xx+137.
2. Anderson, James. 2007. Paradox in christian theology. Bletchley: Authentic Media.
3. Armstrong, David M. 2010. Sketch for a systematic metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Barrio, Eduardo A., and Bruno Da Re. 2018. “Paraconsistency and its philosophical interpretations.” Australasian Journal of Logic 15(2):51–170.
5. Beall, J.C. 2006a. “Negation’s holiday: aspectival dialetheism.” In A logical approach to philosophy, edited by David DeVidi and Tim Kenyon, 169–192. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Hegel’s Interpretation of the Sorites;History and Philosophy of Logic;2023-04-03
2. Two in One. What the Logic of Christology Can Teach Us;Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures;2023