The Local Politics of Green Mobility in San Francisco and Copenhagen

Author:

Henderson Jason

Abstract

AbstractIn this chapter I consider how local politics shapes policies that promote or impede green mobility, including walking, cycling, and public transport organized around compact, high-density, car free and car-lite urbanism. I refer to municipal or city-scale politics and examine two aspirational green mobility cities, Copenhagen, Denmark, and San Francisco, California to help understand why green mobility transitions have been slow to realize in even the most promising localities. Despite different governing structures and histories, the politics of green mobility in both cities is remarkably similar. In both cities there are three broad factions demonstrating ideological difference over green mobility. (1) A left/progressive political faction promotes green mobility as a public good that government should actively promote. (2) A neoliberal faction, sometimes labeled “moderate” in both San Francisco and Copenhagen, also promotes green mobility, but with a market-oriented, deregulated hue, especially on housing and real estate. (3) A right/conservative politics of mobility expresses skepticism towards green mobility transitions and seeks to preserve car access to city spaces. I highlight how each mobility ideology is operationalized through debates over green mobility, including housing, in San Francisco and Copenhagen during 2022, two years after the Covid-19 Pandemic first locked-down cities.

Publisher

Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Reference55 articles.

1. Andersen, H.T., und Lars Winther. 2010. Crisis in the resurgent city? The rise of Copenhagen. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34(3): 693–700.

2. Baeten, G., L.D. Berg, und A. Lund Hansen. 2015. Introduction: Neoliberalism and post-welfare nordic states in transition. Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography 97(3): 209–212.

3. Beitel, K. 2013. Local protest, global movements: capital, community, and state in San Francisco. Temple University Press.

4. Berlingske. 2022. New housing construction in Copenhagen will be without parking spaces (translated from Danish). https://byrummonitor.dk/Nyheder/art8829965/Nyt-boligbyggeri-i-København-bliver-uden-parkeringspladser. Accessed 10 July 2022.

5. Brenner, N., Peter Marcuse, und Margit Mayer, Hrsg. 2012. Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3