Abstract
AbstractCadmium has appeared as an important element for certain types of solar cells and rechargeable batteries. It is possible that there will be a large increase in demand for technical cadmium in the future. This is in conflict with environmental policies for phasing out cadmium from any technical use worldwide because of its great toxicity to humans. Cadmium toxicity is on par with that of mercury, and data suggests that cadmium exposure has no safe lower limit. There is no shortage of cadmium to extract, and no shortage from lack of cadmium available in the future zinc flow is to be expected. There is a global treaty to ban it from all use. The Integrated Assessment Model WORLD7 was used to assess different aspects of the supply of cadmium to society. It would be possible to produce at least 250,000 tons/year; in reality, the 2023 production is about 24,000 tons/year. The price is about 3500–4500 $/ton and is volatile. Because there is a United Nations agreed global policy to phase out cadmium from all use, demand for cadmium will soon not be met, and there will be an actual shortage of cadmium for any use, including photovoltaic technologies and semiconductors. This is good news for nature, but bad news for the CdTe and CIGS types of photovoltaic panels. It is estimated that only 25% of the planned future capacity may not be available unless good substitutes for cadmium can be found.
Funder
Inland Norway University Of Applied Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference92 articles.
1. ANSES. (2019). ANSES makes recommendations to limit cadmium exposure from consumption of edible seaweed. https://www.anses.fr/en/content/anses-makes-recommendations-limit-cadmium-exposure-consumption-edible-seaweed. Accessed during 2023.
2. Bakker, D., de Vries, W., & Sverdrup, H. (1998). Effects-based approaches to assess the risk of heavy metal inputs to surface waters–Overview methods and models. In: Workshop on critical limits and effect based approaches for heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants, Gregor, H., Spranger, T., Hörnerbach, F. (eds). Umweltbundesamt Texte 5:98:225–278 ISSN 0722–186X.
3. Balali-Mood, M., Naseri, K., Tahergorabi, Z., Khazdair, M. R., & Sadeghi, M. (2021). Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: Mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12, 643972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.643972
4. Bernhoft, R. A. (2012). Mercury toxicity and treatment: A review of the literature. Journal of Environmental Public Health, 2012, 460508. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/460508
5. Bleiwas, D. I. (2010). Byproduct mineral commodities used for the production of photovoltaic cells: United States of America Geological Survey, USGS Circular 1365, 10 pages, available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1365/. Downloaded January 2023.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献