Abstract
AbstractThe last decade has seen significant improvements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including robotics, machine vision, speech recognition, and text generation. Increasing automation will undoubtedly affect the future of work, and discussions on how the development of AI in the workplace will impact labor markets often include two scenarios: (1) labor replacement and (2) labor enabling. The former involves replacing workers with machines, while the latter assumes that human–machine cooperation can significantly improve worker productivity. In this context, it is often argued that (1) could lead to mass unemployment and that (2) therefore would be more desirable. We argue, however, that the labor-enabling scenario conflates two distinct possibilities. On the one hand, technology can increase productivity while also promoting “the goods of work,” such as the opportunity to pursue excellence, experience a sense of community, and contribute to society (human augmentation). On the other hand, higher productivity can also be achieved in a way that reduces opportunities for the “goods of work” and/or increases “the bads of work,” such as injury, reduced physical and mental health, reduction of autonomy, privacy, and human dignity (human stunting). We outline the differences of these outcomes and discuss the implications for the labor market in the context of contemporaneous discussions on the value of work and human wellbeing.
Funder
Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation
Stockholm University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference73 articles.
1. Abril, D., Harwell, D. (2021). Keystroke tracking, screenshots, and facial recognition: The boss may be watching long after the pandemic ends. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/24/remote-work-from-home-surveillance/. Accessed 24 Apr 2023)
2. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz022
3. Acemoglu, D., Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. Working Paper 24196, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24196
4. Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
5. Altman, S.A. (2021). Moore’s Law for Everything [WWW Document]. https://moores.samaltman.com/. Accessed 22 Feb 2023