Abstract
AbstractThe paper presents the comparison of the results of nonlinear static analyses carried out using six software packages (SWs) available at professional level and operating in the field of the equivalent frame (EF) approach on a model representative of a complex masonry building. The structure is inspired by the school “P. Capuzi” in Visso (MC, Italy), proposed as one of the benchmark structures in the “URM nonlinear modelling—Benchmark project” funded by the Italian Department of Civil Protection within the context of the ReLUIS projects. The 2-stories building is characterized by an irregular T-shaped plan and load-bearing walls consisting of two-leaf stone masonry with a rather regular bond scheme. The school was severely damaged by the seismic sequence that hit Central Italy in 2016/2017 and essentially exhibited a global in-plane box-type response, with a clear evidence of cracks concentrated in piers and spandrels. The availability of an accurate survey of the crack extension represents a precious and rare reference to firstly address in the paper the rules to be adopted in the EF models for the definition of the structural elements geometry. Then, the comparison of results is made with a twofold aim: firstly, by setting the models adopting shared and consistent modelling assumptions across the SWs; secondly, by investigating the sensitivity of the seismic response to some common epistemic and modelling uncertainties (namely: the adoption of various EF idealization rules for walls, the out-of-plane contribution of piers, the flange effect). In both cases, results are post-processed to define reference values of the achievable dispersion. The comparison is carried out in relation to a wide set of parameters, namely: global parameters (e.g. dynamic properties, pushover curves and equivalent bilinear curves); synthetic parameters of the structural safety (i.e. the maximum acceleration compatible with the ultimate limit state); the damage pattern simulated by SWs.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Genova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference56 articles.
1. 2Si (2020) PRO_SAM Program, included in PRO_SAP Program, Release 20.7.0, www.2si.it/en/pro_sam_eng/3Muri Program (2016) Release 11.0., distributed by STADATA. www.3muri.com.
2. Aedes PCM (2017) Progettazione di Costruzioni in Muratura, Release 2017.1.4.0 distributed by Aedes, Manuale d’uso (in Italian)
3. ASCE 41-17 (2017) Seismic evaluation and upgrade of existing buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia
4. Aşıkoğlu A, Vasconcelos G, Lourenço PB, Pantò B (2020) Pushover analysis of unreinforced irregular masonry buildings: Lessons from different modeling approaches. Eng Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110830
5. Aşıkoğlu A, Vasconcelos G, Lourenço PB (2021) Overview on the nonlinear static procedures and performance-based approach on modern unreinforced masonry buildings with structural irregularity. Buildings 11:147. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040147
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献