Science religion encounters, epistemic trespass, neighbourliness and overlapping domains: theorisation and quantitative evidence of extent

Author:

Bowie Robert A.ORCID,Aantjes RosanneORCID,Woolley MaryORCID,Hulbert SabinaORCID,Thomas CarolineORCID,Revell LynnORCID,Riordan John-PaulORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis study advances a concept of science religion encounter (SRE), with preliminary theorisation and shares findings on the extent and nature of such encounters reported by secondary religious education and science teachers. SREs are interdisciplinary engagements in classrooms involving subject knowledge from more than one subject. The researchers hypothesised they may arise unexpectedly, when a pupil asks a question, or be teacher-planned and intended. This article further elaborates the concept of SRE with reference to the concepts of ‘epistemic trespassing’ (ET), epistemic neighbourliness, and overlapping domains, introducing these to the field of education. The study is contextualised in the school classroom with quantitative data gathered among beginning and experienced teachers measuring whether this ET in SRE topics enter the classroom via ‘spontaneity’ or via a ‘deliberateness’. This clarifies the different roles a teacher may play and offers considerations for teacher development when navigating an SRE in ways that potentially reduce lost learning.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. The Clarendon Press.

2. Anderson, J., & Taner, G. (2023). Building the expert teacher prototype: A metasummary of teacher expertise studies in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 38(2023), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100485

3. Astley, J. (2005). The science and religion interface within young people’s attitudes and beliefs. In L. J. Francis, M. Robbins, & J. Astley (Eds.), Religion, education and adolescence (pp. 39–54). University of Wales Press.

4. Ballantyne, N. (2019a). Epistemic trespassing mind, 128(510), 367–395. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx042

5. Ballantyne, N. (2019b). Knowing our limits. Oxford University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3