Theorem proving in artificial neural networks: new frontiers in mathematical AI

Author:

Pantsar MarkusORCID

Abstract

AbstractComputer assisted theorem proving is an increasingly important part of mathematical methodology, as well as a long-standing topic in artificial intelligence (AI) research. However, the current generation of theorem proving software have limited functioning in terms of providing new proofs. Importantly, they are not able to discriminate interesting theorems and proofs from trivial ones. In order for computers to develop further in theorem proving, there would need to be a radical change in how the software functions. Recently, machine learning results in solving mathematical tasks have shown early promise that deep artificial neural networks could learn symbolic mathematical processing. In this paper, I analyze the theoretical prospects of such neural networks in proving mathematical theorems. In particular, I focus on the question how such AI systems could be incorporated in practice to theorem proving and what consequences that could have. In the most optimistic scenario, this includes the possibility of autonomous automated theorem provers (AATP). Here I discuss whether such AI systems could, or should, become accepted as active agents in mathematical communities.

Funder

RWTH Aachen University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference76 articles.

1. Alemi, A. A., Chollet, F., Een, N., Irving, G., Szegedy, C., & Urban, J. (2017). DeepMath—deep sequence models for premise selection. arXiv:1606.04442 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04442.

2. Appel, K., & Haken, W. (1976). Every planar map is four colorable. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 82(5), 711–712.

3. Bansal, K., Loos, S., Rabe, M., Szegedy, C., & Wilcox, S. J. (2019). HOList: An environment for machine learning of higher order logic theorem proving. Thirty-Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.03241.

4. Barberousse, A., & Vorms, M. (2014). About the warrants of computer-based empirical knowledge. Synthese, 191(15), 3595–3620.

5. Barendregt, H., & Wiedijk, F. (2005). The challenge of computer mathematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 363(1835), 2351–2375. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1650.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3