Evidence for interactive common causes. Resuming the Cartwright-Hausman-Woodward debate

Author:

Näger Paul M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe most serious candidates for common causes that fail to screen off (‘interactive common causes’, ICCs) and thus violate the causal Markov condition (CMC) refer to quantum phenomena. In her seminal debate with Hausman and Woodward, Cartwright early on focussed on unfortunate non-quantum examples. Especially, Hausman and Woodward’s redescriptions of quantum cases saving the CMC remain unchallenged. This paper takes up this lose end of the discussion and aims to resolve the debate in favour of Cartwright’s position. It systematically considers redescriptions of ICC structures, including those by Hausman and Woodward, and explains why these are inappropriate, when quantum mechanics (in an objective collapse interpretation) is true. It first shows that all cases of purported quantum ICCs are cases of entanglement and then, using the tools of causal modelling, it provides an analysis of the quantum mechanical formalism for the case that the collapse of entangled systems is best described as a causal model with an ICC.

Funder

Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference47 articles.

1. Butterfield, J. (1989). A space-time approach to the Bell inequality. In J. T. Cushing E. McMullin (Eds.) Philosophical consequences of quantum theory: Reflections on Bell’s theorem (pp. 114–144). University of Notre Dame Press.

2. Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Clarendon Press.

3. Cartwright, N. (1988). How to tell a common cause. In J.H. Fetzer (Ed.) , Probability and causality: Essays in honor of Wesley C. Salmon (pp. 181–188). Reidel.

4. Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Oxford University Press.

5. Cartwright, N. (1993). Marks and probabilities: Two ways to find causal structure. In F. Stadler (Ed.) , Scientific philosophy: Origins and developments. Kluwer Academic.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Simpson’s paradox beyond confounding;European Journal for Philosophy of Science;2024-09

2. Master equations for Wigner functions with spontaneous collapse and their relation to thermodynamic irreversibility;Journal of Computational Electronics;2021-11-16

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3