Sales of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) and Cigarette Sales in the USA: A Trend Break Analysis
-
Published:2023-01-16
Issue:1
Volume:46
Page:79-93
-
ISSN:0168-7034
-
Container-title:Journal of Consumer Policy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Consum Policy
Author:
Selya A.ORCID, Wissmann R., Shiffman S., Chandra S., Sembower M., Joselow J., Kim S.
Abstract
AbstractElectronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are a potentially lower-risk tobacco product which could help smokers switch completely away from cigarettes. However, the lack of strong evidence to date of a measurable, population-level effect on reducing smoking has generated skepticism about ENDS’ potential benefits. This study examines whether increased US ENDS sales have been associated with reduced cigarette sales. Retail data on weekly per-capita cigarette and ENDS purchases in the USA during 2014–2019 were obtained from a national sample of brick-and-mortar retail outlets. Trends in cigarette sales were modeled before (2014–2016) ENDS had a substantial market share, and, after adjusting for macroeconomic factors, projected into the post-period (2017–2019). Actual cigarette sales were lower than projected sales (by up to 16% across the post-period), indicating a substantial “cigarette shortfall” in the post-period. To explore whether general (i.e., inclusive of potentially many mechanisms) substitution by ENDS can explain the cigarette shortfall, its association with per-capita ENDS volume sales was examined. Higher ENDS sales were significantly associated with a greater cigarette shortfall: for every additional per-capita ENDS unit, cigarette sales were 1.4 packs-per-capita lower than expected (B = 1.4, p < .0001). Error correction models which account for spurious correlation yielded similar results. These findings support ENDS serving as a substitute for cigarettes (through potentially many mechanisms including cigarette price), causing cigarette consumption to decline. Since ENDS potentially pose lower risk than cigarettes, this general substitution effect suggests that risk-proportionate tobacco regulation could mitigate the tobacco-related health burden.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference66 articles.
1. Abouk, R., & Adams, S. (2017). Bans on electronic cigarette sales to minors and smoking among high school students. Journal of Health Economics, 54, 17–24. 2. Abouk, R., De, P., & Pesko, M. (2021). Estimating the effects of Tobacco-21 on youth tobacco use and sales (Research paper, 28 December 2021). Accessed on SSRNat: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3737506. Accessed 7 Jan 2023 3. Ali, F. R. M., Diaz, M. C., Vallone, D., Tynan, M. A., Cordova, J., Seaman, E. L., Trivers, K. F., Schillo, B. A., Talley, B., & King, B. A. (2020). E-cigarette unit sales, by product and flavor type - United States, 2014–2020. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(37), 1313–1318. 4. Allcott, H., & Rafkin, C. (2021). Optimal regulation of e-cigarettes: Theory and evidence (National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper). https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27000/w27000.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2022 5. Al-Muslim, A. (2019, April 18). Philip Morris’s cigarettes sales fall, heated tobacco products demand up. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/philip-morriss-cigarettes-sales-fall-e-cigarettes-demand-up-11555598436. Accessed 29 Nov 2022
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|