Abstract
AbstractAs social robots are being built with the aim of employing them in our social environments, it is crucial to understand whether we are inclined to include them in our social ingroups. Social inclusion might depend on various factors. To understand if people have the tendency to treat robots as their in-group members, we adapted a classical social psychology paradigm, namely the “Cyberball game”, to a 3-D experimental protocol involving an embodied humanoid robot. In our experiment, participants played the ball-tossing game with the iCub robot and another human confederate. In our version, the human confederate was instructed to exclude the robot from the game. This was done to investigate whether participants would re-include the robot in the game. In addition, we examined if acquired technical knowledge about robots would affect social inclusion. To this aim, participants performed the Cyberball twice, namely before and after a familiarization phase when they were provided with technical knowledge about the mechanics and software related to the functionality of the robot. Results showed that participants socially re-included the robot during the task, equally before and after the familiarization session. The familiarization phase did not affect the frequency of social inclusion, suggesting that humans tend to socially include robots, independent of the knowledge they have about their inner functioning.
Funder
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Kerr NL, Levine JM (2008) The detection of social exclusion: evolution and beyond. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 12(1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.12.1.39
2. Wesselmann ED, Wirth JH, Pryor JB, Reeder GD, Williams KD (2013) When do we ostracize? Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci, 4(1):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612443386
3. Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 117:497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
4. Pickett CL, Gardner WL (2005) The social monitoring system: enhanced sensitivity to social cues as an adaptive response to social exclusion, in The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying, in In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), pp. 213–226
5. Buss DM (1991) Do women have evolved mate preferences for men with resources? A reply to Smuts. Ethol Sociobiol 12(5):401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(91)90034-N