Inter-rater reliability and double reading analysis of an automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound system: comparison of two independent examiners-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Inter-rater reliability and double reading analysis of an automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound system: comparison of two independent examiners

Published:2017-07-26 Issue:3 Volume:296 Page:571-582
ISSN:0932-0067
Container-title:Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
language:en
Short-container-title:Arch Gynecol Obstet

Author:

Maier Anna,Heil Joerg,Lauer Anna,Harcos Aba,Schaefgen Benedikt,von Au Alexandra,Spratte Julia,Riedel Fabian,Rauch Geraldine,Hennigs André,Domschke Christoph,Schott Sarah,Rom Joachim,Schuetz Florian,Sohn Christof,Golatta Michael^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-017-4473-y/fulltext.html

Reference48 articles.

1. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, Holmqvist M, Yen MF, Abdsalah S, Epstein B, Frodis E, Ljungberg E, Hedborg-Melander C, Sundbom A, Tholin M, Wiege M, Akerlund A, Wu HM, Tung TS, Chiu YH, Chiu CP, Huang CC, Smith RA, Rosen M, Stenbeck M, Holmberg L (2002) The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 95(3):458–469. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10765

2. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Bouvard V, Bianchini F, Straif K, International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working G (2015) Breast-cancer screening–viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med 372(24):2353–2358. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1504363

3. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225(1):165–175

4. Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE (2004) Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 230(1):29–41. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2301020870

5. Ciatto S, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M (2004) Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening. Br J Cancer 90(2):393–396. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601548

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps;Diagnostics;2023-03-11

2. Deep learning applied to breast imaging classification and segmentation with human expert intervention;Journal of Ultrasound;2022-01-09

3. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced breast MRI versus X-ray mammography in women with different degrees of breast density;Acta Radiologica;2020-07-17

4. The value of coronal view as a stand-alone assessment in women undergoing automated breast ultrasound;La radiologia medica;2020-07-16

5. Validation of radiologists’ findings by computer-aided detection (CAD) software in breast cancer detection with automated 3D breast ultrasound: a concept study in implementation of artificial intelligence software;Acta Radiologica;2019-07-19