Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of transvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag in gynecological surgeries, with a focus on its benefits, potential risks, and recommendations for its use.
Methods
We conducted a comprehensive search of Epistemonikos, Web of Science, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies on transvaginal contained morcellation in adult patients undergoing gynecological surgeries. The review included 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria, encompassing diverse surgical procedures, patient profiles, and outcomes. These studies were thoroughly reviewed and analyzed to assess the safety and efficacy of the morcellation technique.
Results
Key findings from the selected studies indicate that transvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag offers several advantages in gynecological surgeries, including reduced invasiveness, shorter operative times, and minimal blood loss when compared to conventional methods. The risk of tumor recurrence or dissemination appears to be low when appropriate precautions are taken, emphasizing the technique’s safety, especially when performed by experienced surgical teams. While some studies reported complications, these were generally not directly associated with the morcellation technique.
Conclusion
Transvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag demonstrates potential as a safe and effective option for gynecological surgeries. The technique offers the benefits of minimally invasive procedures, including reduced bleeding, shorter recovery times, and improved cosmetic outcomes. This review also highlights the need for standardization in study methodologies and reporting, as the heterogeneity in outcomes across the selected studies poses challenges in drawing definitive conclusions.
Funder
University of Health Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Mohiuddin K, Swanson SJ (2013) Maximizing the benefit of minimally invasive surgery. J Surg Oncol 108(5):315–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23398
2. Kho KA, Nezhat CH (2014) Evaluating the risks of electric uterine morcellation. JAMA 311(9):905. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.1093
3. Park J-Y, Park S-K, Kim D, Kim J-H, Kim Y, Kim Y, Nam J (2011) The impact of tumor morcellation during surgery on the prognosis of patients with apparently early uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 122(2):255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.021
4. Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2020) UPDATE: Perform only contained morcellation when laparoscopic power morcellation is appropriate: FDA Safety Communication. In: U.S. Food And Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/update-perform-only-contained-morcellation-when-laparoscopic-power-morcellation-appropriate-fda
5. Taylan E, Şahin Ç, Zeybek B, Akdemir A (2017) Contained morcellation: review of current methods and future directions. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2017.00015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献