Abstract
AbstractCan the main methods of social welfare analysis be extended to cover multiple species? Following a non-anthropocentric approach, we examine the pros and cons of various objective and subjective methods of well-being comparisons across species. We argue against normalizing by specific capacities but in favor of taking account of individual preferences and specializations. While many conceptual and practical difficulties remain, it appears possible to develop methods for the assessment of collective well-being of multi-species communities and ecosystems.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference84 articles.
1. Adler, M. D. (2013). Well-being and fair distribution. Oxford University Press.
2. Adler, M. D. (2019). Measuring social welfare. Oxford University Press.
3. Adler, M. D., & Fleurbaey, M. (Eds.). (2016). Oxford handbook of well-being and public policy. Oxford University Press.
4. Appleby, M. C., Olsson, I. A. S., & Galindo, F. (2018). Animal welfare (3rd ed.). CABI.
5. Arrhenius, G. (forthcoming). Population ethics. Oxford University Press.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献