The potential of pumice as a litter material and its influence on growth performance, carcass parameters, litter quality traits, behavior, and welfare in broiler chickens
-
Published:2024-04-18
Issue:4
Volume:56
Page:
-
ISSN:0049-4747
-
Container-title:Tropical Animal Health and Production
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Trop Anim Health Prod
Author:
Duman MustafaORCID, Şekeroğlu AhmetORCID, Tainika BrianORCID
Abstract
AbstractThis study evaluated the possibilities of pumice (light stones) as litter material in broiler production. Experimental treatments included wood shavings (WS), acidic pumice (AP), and basic pumice (BP) alone, and in combination; wood shaving + acidic pumice (WSAP) and wood shaving + basic pumice (WSBP) in a ratio of 1:1. Two trials were performed, one in summer, and the other in winter. Each trial involved 750 mixed-sex Ross (308) broilers. Also, there were 15 replicate pens with 50 broilers and a stocking density of 12.5 birds/m2 for each pen at the beginning of each trial. Performance, litter quality, carcass parameters, body and leg abnormalities, body temperature, fear and stress responses, proportional asymmetry, and some behavior expressions were investigated. The litter treatment influenced the final live body weight, litter moisture, ammonia concentration, footpad dermatitis, hock burn, breast blister, hot carcass yield, heart, liver, spleen, abdominal fat, wing and neck ratio, breast and back cleanliness, and the expression of dust bathing and foraging behaviors (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a seasonal effect on live body weight, feed conversion ratio, livability, litter pH, 42-day litter moisture, hot carcass yield, back cleanliness, footpad dermatitis, hock burn, footpad temperature, heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and expression of pecking behavior (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). It is suggested that acidic pumice stone alone or in a mixture with wood shavings could be used as a reliable litter material, alternative to wood shavings.
Funder
Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Akşit, M., Bozkurt, M., and Alçiçek, A., 2000. Farklı formda yemlerle beslenen etlik piliçlerde altlığa değişik düzeylerde zeolit ilavesinin performans ve altlık özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Hayvansal Üretim, 41(1), 84–90. 2. Altan, A., Bayraktar, H., and Önenç, A., 2001. Etlik Piliçlerde Sıcak Stresinin Et Rengi ve pHâ ı Üzerine Etkileri, Hayvansal Üretim, 42(2), 1–8. 3. Anonymous., 1989. Türk Standartları- Tavuk Gövde Eti Parçalama Kuralları, (T.S.E, Ankara). 4. Ashtari, A.K., Majd, A.M.S., Riskowski, G.L., Mukhtar, S., and Zhao, L., 2016. Removing ammonia from air with a constant pH, slightly acidic water spray wet scrubber using recycled scrubbing solution, Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 10, 1–10. 5. Avcılar, Ö.V., Kocakaya, A., Onbaşılar, E.E., and Pirpanahi, M., 2018. Influence of sepiolite additions to different litter materials on performance and some welfare parameters of broilers and litter characteristics, Poultry Science, 97(9), 3085–3091.
|
|