Abstract
AbstractPrevious studies have associated several variables concerning motivation and other domains with underachievement, i. e. a student's academic achievement falling short of what their cognitive abilities, as the best predictor of academic performance, would indicate. The present study extends these findings using a more rigorous approach in defining underachievers and suitable control groups. Using discriminant analysis, underachievers identified in a German twin family study were compared not only to achievers with comparable IQ scores, but also with students of lower aptitude, but comparably low grades, as well as overachieving students. Results confirm previous findings that compared to successful students, underachievers report lower levels of motivation and parental support; beyond this comparison, underachievers also differed from other low achievers, mostly in terms of their personality. In total, 40% of the variance between the groups were explained. Additionally, the data shed doubt on the common assumption that underachievers are an unusually heterogenous group of students.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Universität des Saarlandes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference71 articles.
1. Asbury, K., Moran, N., & Plomin, R. (2016). Nonshared environmental influences on academic achievement at age 16: A qualitative hypothesis-generating monozygotic-twin differences study. AERA Open, 2(4), 2332858416673596.
2. Baker, J. A., Bridger, R., & Evans, K. (1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629804200102
3. Balduf, M. (2009). Underachievement among college students. Journal of advanced academics, 20(2), 274–294.
4. Barbier, K., Donche, V., & Verschueren, K. (2019). Academic (under) achievement of intellectually gifted students in the transition between primary and secondary education: An individual learner perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02533
5. Baum, M.A., Klatzka, C.H., Iser, J. & Hahn, E. (2020). TwinLife scales manual: F2F1, CATI 1, & F2F2. TwinLife Technical Report Series, 08. ISSN 2512–403X. Bielefeld University / Saarland University.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献