Author:
Halligan S.,Tolan D.,Amitai M. M.,Hoeffel C.,Kim S. H.,Maccioni F.,Morrin M. M.,Mortele K. J.,Rafaelsen S. R.,Rimola J.,Schmidt S.,Stoker J.,Yang J.
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To develop imaging guidelines for patients with fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis.
Methods
An expert group of 13 members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) used a modified Delphi process to vote on a series of consensus statements relating to the imaging of patients with potential anal sepsis. Participants first completed a questionnaire to gather practice information and to help frame the statements posed.
Results
In the first round of voting, the expert group scored 51 statements of which 45 (88%) achieved immediate consensus. The remaining 6 statements were redrafted following input from the expert group and consensus achieved for all during a second round of voting, including an additional statement drafted. No statement was rejected due to a lack of consensus. After redrafting to improve clarity, 53 individual statements were presented.
Conclusion
These expert consensus statements can be used to guide appropriate indication, acquisition, interpretation and reporting of medical imaging for patients with potential fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis.
Key Points
• Medical imaging, notably magnetic resonance imaging, is used widely for the diagnosis and monitoring of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal and perianal sepsis.
• While the indexed medical literature is clear that diagnostic accuracy is potentially excellent, this depends on competent image acquisition and interpretation.
• In order to facilitate this, the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) has produced expert consensus guidelines regarding the imaging of fistula-in-ano and related conditions.
Funder
UCLH Biomedical Research Centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference13 articles.
1. Plumb AAO, Lambregts D, Bellini D, Stoker J, Taylor S, ESGAR Research Committee (2019) Making useful clinical guidelines: the ESGAR perspective. Eur Radiol 29:3757–3760
2. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD et al (2001) The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica
3. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P et al (2011) The 2011 Oxford CEBM evidence levels of evidence (introductory document). Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Available via http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed 26 Mar 2020
4. Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P, Barker PG, Reznek RH, Phillips RK (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of anal fistulae. Lancet 340:394–396
5. Buchanan G, Halligan S, Williams A et al (2002) Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet 360:1661–1662
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献