Abstract
AbstractPlace names determine geographic units in space, encapsulate the description of places where inhabitants conduct their activities, and preserve the perception of the territory in past times. The very definition of landscape impacts two interrelated concepts: human action and perception. On another note, traditional pathways are structuring elements of the landscape, bearing witness to the dynamic relationship between the territory and its inhabitants by connecting residences and workplaces. This work aims to assess the relationship between the landscape mosaic and the toponyms of pathways and roads gathered in the current cartography of Euskadi (Spain), a territory influenced by the existence of two official languages. Given the spatial component of the data, this analysis is conducted through geographic information systems. Firstly, a corpus of 3072 pathway names selected from current official toponymic databases is compiled, as well as the content of the first edition of the National Topographic Map. Subsequently, the semantic content of the corpus elements is examined, as well as the nature of their referential content concerning the landscape units obtained from the Atlas of Spanish Landscapes. The results show common factors in characterizing landscapes and the etymology of names. Thus, it is noted that traditional agricultural, forestry, livestock, and traditional industry activities shape the toponymy in the most populated landscape units. Meanwhile, references to the orography typify the more mountainous landscapes. Therefore, the geographical study demonstrates the existence of common factors that link landscape and toponymy, validating one as a study source for the other.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference80 articles.
1. Agboola, O. P., Rasidi, M. H., Said, I., Abogan, S. O., & Adejuwon, A. S. (2018). Morphological and GIS-based land use analysis: A critical exploration of a rural neighborhood. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 2, 106–121. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.4675
2. Agirregoikoa, J. (2011). El nomenclátor geográfico de Euskadi a partir de la base de datos de toponimia de la viceconsejería de política lingüística del Gobierno Vasco. In Els noms en la vida quotidiana. Actes del XXIV Congrés Internacional d’ICOS sobre Ciències Onomástiques (pp. 2344–2356). Barcelona, Spain. Onomástica. Biblioteca Técnica de Política Lingüística. https://doi.org/10.2436/15.8040.01.227
3. Alcántara-Manzanares, J., & Muñoz, J. (2017). Multivariate versus traditional methodology for the identification and classification of landscapes. Geography papers, 63, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.6018/geografia/2017/279791
4. Alcázar González, A., & Azcárate Luxán, M. (2000). Aproximación a la toponimia del repertorio de caminos de Guadalajara. In Caminería hispánica vol. 1 (1st ed., pp. 223–242). Centro de Estudios y Experimentación de Obras Públicas, CEDEX.
5. Alcázar González, A., & Azcárate Luxán, M. (2005). Toponimia: Normas para el MTN25. Conceptos básicos y terminología. Publicación técnica n. 42. Instituto Geográfico Nacional, Madrid, digital edition.