Abstract
AbstractThis paper presents a new approach that automates the tuning process in topology optimization of parameters that are traditionally defined by the user. The new method draws inspiration from hyperparameter optimization in machine learning. A new design problem is formulated where the topology optimization hyperparameters are defined as design variables and the problem is solved by surrogate optimization. The new design problem is nested, such that a topology optimization problem is solved as an inner problem. To encourage the identification of high-performing solutions while limiting the computational resource requirements, the outer objective function is defined as the original objective combined with penalization for intermediate densities and deviations from the prescribed material consumption. The contribution is demonstrated on density-based topology optimization with various hyperparameters and objectives, including compliance minimization, compliant mechanism design, and buckling load factor maximization. Consistent performance is observed across all tested examples. For a simple two hyperparameter case, the new framework is shown to reduce amount of times a topology optimization algorithm is executed by 90% without notably sacrificing the objective compared to a rigorous manual grid search.
Funder
MathWorks
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Alibrahim H, Ludwig SA (2021) Hyperparameter optimization: comparing genetic algorithm against grid search and Bayesian optimization. In: 2021 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), pp 1551–1559
2. Amir O, Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2008) Approximate reanalysis in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78(12):1474–1491
3. Andreassen E, Clausen A, Schevenels M, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O (2011) Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(1):1–16
4. Bardenet R, Brendel M, Kégl B, Sebag M (2013) Collaborative hyperparameter tuning. In: International conference on machine learning. PMLR, pp 199–207
5. Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1(4):193–202