Abstract
Abstract
What could possibly be a meaningful conversation between educational researchers and movement scientists? Curiously, they have much in common. Both groups of researchers increasingly (1) appreciate the human capacity to enact perceptually guided movement as an overarching psychological model of thinking, problem-solving, and learning; (2) theorize the development of perceptual structures, including actual and imaginary percepts, as a key epistemic vehicle for solving motor-control problems; and (3) promote a view of abstract thinking as movement-grounded and movement-oriented perceptual dynamics. Probing toward theoretical synergy between these traditionally disparate fields of research, the present article is built as an interdisciplinary conversation between two researchers—of mathematics education and movement science, respectively—who become aware of their intellectual alignment, garner new insights and inspirations from each other’s work, and speculate on implications of this concordance for their fields. Future exploration into the unity of movement and cognition could enrich dialogue between manifold disciplines, with the overall goal of clarifying, developing, and integrating an interdisciplinary common foundation and framework for the benefit of education.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference95 articles.
1. Abdu, R., Tancredi, S., Abrahamson, D., & Balasubramaniam, R. (under review). A complex-systems view on mathematical learning as hand–eye coordination. In M. Schindler, A. Shvarts, & A. Lilienthal. (Eds.), Eye-tracking research in mathematics education [Special issue]. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
2. Abdullah, A., Adil, M., Rosenbaum, L., Clemmons, M., Shah, M., Abrahamson, D., & Neff, M. (2017). Pedagogical agents to support embodied, discovery-based learning. In J. Beskow, C. Peters, G. Castellano, C. O'Sullivan, I. Leite, & S. Kopp (Eds.), Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2017) (pp. 1–14). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67401-8_1
3. Abrahamson, D. (2009). Embodied design: Constructing means for constructing meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 27–47.
4. Abrahamson, D. (2014). Building educational activities for understanding: An elaboration on the embodied-design framework and its epistemic grounds. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.07.002
5. Abrahamson, D. (2020). Strawberry feel forever: Understanding metaphor as sensorimotor dynamics. The Senses and Society, 15(2), 216–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2020.1764742
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献