Author:
Jiménez Juan Luis,Ojeda-Cabral Manuel,Ordóñez-de-Haro José Manuel
Abstract
AbstractCompetition authorities need a better understanding of the determinants of cartel self-reporting in order to increase cartel members’ incentives to apply for the benefit from leniency programs and thus improve the effectiveness of anti-cartel policy. Using information on 683 firm groups that participated in 132 cartels that were penalized by the European Commission between 1996 and 2020, we estimate which type of cartel member is most likely to be the first or subsequent leniency applicant. Our results emphasize the role of firm groups as a driver to self-report: The higher is the proportion of firms that are part of the same group (relative to the size of the cartel), the greater is the likelihood of applying for leniency. Fines also incentivize cartelists—with the exceptions of ringleaders—to self-report. While ringleaders or instigators tend to avoid being first confessors, they appear to be more likely to self-report than are others only after someone else has revealed the cartel. Finally, cartels that do bid-rigging are less likely to be uncovered by a leniency application.
Funder
Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad, Junta de Andalucía
Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics
Reference43 articles.
1. Antonielli, M. & Mariniello, M. (2014). Antitrust risk in EU manufacturing: A sector-level ranking. Bruegel Working Paper, No. 2014/07. https://www.bruegel.org/sites/default/files/wp_attachments/WP_2014_07__01.pdf
2. Arp, D. J., & Swaak, C. R. (2003). A tempting offer: Immunity from Fines for Cartel Conduct under the European Commission’s New Leniency Notice. European Competition Law Review, 24(1), 9–18.
3. Bertrand, O., & Lumineau, F. (2016). Partners in crime: The effects of diversity on the longevity of cartels. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 983–1008.
4. Bigoni, M., Fridolfsson, S. O., Le Coq, C., & Spagnolo, G. (2012). Fines, leniency, and rewards in antitrust. RAND Journal of Economics, 43(2), 368–390.
5. Borrell, J. R., García, C., Jiménez J. L. & Ordóñez-de-Haro, J. M. (2018). Cartel destabilization effect of leniency programs. In García Galindo, C., Essays on cartels and competition policy. European University Institute, PhD Thesis. Department of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2870/13080.