Who Blows the Whistle on Cartels? Finding the Leniency Applicant at the European Commission

Author:

Jiménez Juan Luis,Ojeda-Cabral Manuel,Ordóñez-de-Haro José Manuel

Abstract

AbstractCompetition authorities need a better understanding of the determinants of cartel self-reporting in order to increase cartel members’ incentives to apply for the benefit from leniency programs and thus improve the effectiveness of anti-cartel policy. Using information on 683 firm groups that participated in 132 cartels that were penalized by the European Commission between 1996 and 2020, we estimate which type of cartel member is most likely to be the first or subsequent leniency applicant. Our results emphasize the role of firm groups as a driver to self-report: The higher is the proportion of firms that are part of the same group (relative to the size of the cartel), the greater is the likelihood of applying for leniency. Fines also incentivize cartelists—with the exceptions of ringleaders—to self-report. While ringleaders or instigators tend to avoid being first confessors, they appear to be more likely to self-report than are others only after someone else has revealed the cartel. Finally, cartels that do bid-rigging are less likely to be uncovered by a leniency application.

Funder

Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad, Junta de Andalucía

Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities

Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics

Reference43 articles.

1. Antonielli, M. & Mariniello, M. (2014). Antitrust risk in EU manufacturing: A sector-level ranking. Bruegel Working Paper, No. 2014/07. https://www.bruegel.org/sites/default/files/wp_attachments/WP_2014_07__01.pdf

2. Arp, D. J., & Swaak, C. R. (2003). A tempting offer: Immunity from Fines for Cartel Conduct under the European Commission’s New Leniency Notice. European Competition Law Review, 24(1), 9–18.

3. Bertrand, O., & Lumineau, F. (2016). Partners in crime: The effects of diversity on the longevity of cartels. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 983–1008.

4. Bigoni, M., Fridolfsson, S. O., Le Coq, C., & Spagnolo, G. (2012). Fines, leniency, and rewards in antitrust. RAND Journal of Economics, 43(2), 368–390.

5. Borrell, J. R., García, C., Jiménez J. L. & Ordóñez-de-Haro, J. M. (2018). Cartel destabilization effect of leniency programs. In García Galindo, C., Essays on cartels and competition policy. European University Institute, PhD Thesis. Department of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2870/13080.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3