Abstract
AbstractPrevious literature shows that prevalent risk measures such as value at risk or expected shortfall are ineffective to curb excessive risk-taking by a tail-risk-seeking trader with S-shaped utility function in the context of portfolio optimisation. However, these conclusions hold only when the constraints are static in the sense that the risk measure is just applied to the terminal portfolio value. In this paper, we consider a portfolio optimisation problem featuring S-shaped utility and a dynamic risk constraint which is imposed throughout the entire trading horizon. Provided that the risk control policy is sufficiently strict relative to the Sharpe ratio of the asset, the trader’s portfolio strategies and the resulting maximal expected utility can be effectively constrained by a dynamic risk measure. Finally, we argue that dynamic risk constraints might still be ineffective if the trader has access to a derivatives market.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences
Reference31 articles.
1. Akume, D., Luderer, B., & Wunderlich, R. (2010). Dynamic shortfall constraints for optimal portfolios. Surveys in Mathematics and its Applications, 5, 135–149.
2. Armstrong, J., & Brigo, D. (2018). Rogue traders versus value-at-risk and expected shortfall. Risk Magazine.
3. Armstrong, J., & Brigo, D. (2019). Risk managing tail-risk seekers: Var and expected shortfall vs s-shaped utility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 101, 122–135.
4. Armstrong, J., & Brigo, D. (2022). Coherent risk measures alone are ineffective in constraining portfolio losses. Journal of Banking & Finance, 140, 106315.
5. Bai, H., & Zhang, L. (2022). Searching for the equity premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 143(2), 897–926.