Abstract
AbstractThe prevention of aquatic invasive species is one of the most cost-effective management strategies for reducing negative ecological, economic, and social impacts to freshwater ecosystems. The release of leftover baitfish via the live bait trade has been identified as a high-risk pathway for introducing invasive species beyond physical barriers (e.g., mountains, dams). To assess differences in behavior surrounding live bait use and angler knowledge of invasive species, we conducted in-person angler surveys at waterbody access sites (i.e. boat ramps with available shore fishing and a shore fishing location with no boat ramp) along the Missouri River, above and below Gavins Point Dam (Yankton, South Dakota, USA). We were primarily interested in whether angler behavior and knowledge differed among fishing locations over the course of a year because of potential variation in risk. Gavins Point Dam is impervious to fish passage and prevents the spread of invasive silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and bighead carp H. nobilis (collectively known as bigheaded carp), but bigheaded carp could be transported above this dam by the use of live baitfish. Regardless of where respondents fished (above the dam/carp absent, below the dam/carp present, or both), 70% ± 11.12 of anglers used live baitfish and 57% ± 3.14 participated in ‘higher risk’ baitfish practices including release. Knowledge of bigheaded carp was limited, as only 2% ± 1.31 of respondents identified both bigheaded carp as invasive in an image collage, 51.82% ± 4.48 could not identify where invasive carp are present/absent, and 40% ± 3.34 of anglers had not received any information regarding bigheaded carp. These findings highlight limitations in angler knowledge, compliance, and identification of native and invasive species. Future implementable actions could include invasive species and baitfish release outreach via electronic media sources or additional signage that address these knowledge gaps.
Funder
South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Anderson LG, White PCL, Stebbing PD, Stentiford GD, Dunn AM (2014) Biosecurity and vector behaviour: evaluating the potential threat posed by anglers and canoeists as pathways for the spread of invasive non-native species and pathogens. PLoS ONE 9(4):e92788. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092788
2. Bouska W, Longhenry C (2009) Annual fish population and angler use and sportfish harvest surveys on Lewis and Clark lake and the lower Missouri river, South Dakota, 2009. South Dakota department of game, fish and parks, wildlife division, annual report 10–07, Pierre.
3. Dainys J, Gorfine H, Mateos-González F, Skov C, Urbanavičius R, Audzijonyte A (2022) Angling counts: harnessing the power of technological advances for recreational fishing surveys. Fish Res 254:106410
4. Drake DAR, Mandrak NE (2014) Ecological risk of live bait fisheries: a new angle on selective fishing. Fisheries 39(5):201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2014.903835
5. Eiswerth ME, Yen ST, Van Kooten GC (2011) Factors determining awareness and knowledge of aquatic invasive species. Ecol Econ 70:1672–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.012