1. Wolf B, De Angelis J. Fear, legitimacy crises, and invisible violence: a structural analysis of the proliferation energy weapons. Conference papers, American Society of Criminology, Chicago; 14–17 Nov 2008.
2. Meyer G. Conducted electrical weapons: a user’s perspective. In: Kroll MW, Ho JD, editors. TASER® conducted electrical weapons: physiology, pathology, and law. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 1–9.
3. Sherry CJ, Brown GC, Beason CW, Jauchem JR, Dayton TE, Ross JA, et al. An evaluation of the electrical properties and bio-behavioral effects of four commercially available TASER®s and the Jaycor Sticky Shocker. US Air Force Research Laboratory Technical Report AFRL-HE-BR-TR-2003-0089. Jun 2003. http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA416553&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf . Accessed 20 Nov 2014.
4. Leman-Langlois S. Afterward: technopolice. In: Leman-Langlois S, editor. Technocrime: technology, crime and social control. Devon: Willon Publishing; 2008. p. 243–6.
5. Ho JD, Dawes DM, Nystrom PC, Collins DP, Nelson RS, Moore JC, Miner JR. Reply to Strote, “Lay person use of conducted electrical weapon research. Forensic Sci. Int. (2014) page e20”. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;2014(238):e21–2.