Accuracy of vestibular schwannoma segmentation using deep learning models - a systematic review & meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Vestibular Schwannoma (VS) is a rare tumor with varied incidence rates, predominantly affecting the 60–69 age group. In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning (DL) algorithms show promise in automating diagnosis. However, a knowledge gap exists in the automated segmentation of VS using DL. To address this gap, this meta-analysis aims to provide insights into the current state of DL algorithms applied to MR images of VS. Methodology Following 2020 PRISMA guidelines, a search across four databases was conducted. Inclusion criteria focused on articles using DL for VS MR image segmentation. The primary metric was the Dice score, supplemented by relative volume error (RVE) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). Results The search process identified 752 articles, leading to 11 studies for meta-analysis. A QUADAS- 2 analysis revealed varying biases. The overall Dice score for 56 models was 0.89 (CI: 0.88–0.90), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 95.9%). Subgroup analyses based on DL architecture, MRI inputs, and testing set sizes revealed performance variations. 2.5D DL networks demonstrated comparable efficacy to 3D networks. Imaging input analyses highlighted the superiority of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging and mixed MRI inputs. Discussion This study fills a gap in systematic review in the automated segmentation of VS using DL techniques. Despite promising results, limitations include publication bias and high heterogeneity. Future research should focus on standardized designs, larger testing sets, and addressing biases for more reliable results. DL have promising efficacy in VS diagnosis, however further validation and standardization is needed. Conclusion In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides comprehensive review into the current landscape of automated VS segmentation using DL. The high Dice score indicates promising agreement in segmentation, yet challenges like bias and heterogeneity must be addressed in the future research.