Effects of Two Early Parenting Programmes on Child Aggression and Risk for Violence in Brazil: a Randomised Controlled Trial
-
Published:2024-07
Issue:5
Volume:25
Page:834-848
-
ISSN:1389-4986
-
Container-title:Prevention Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Prev Sci
Author:
Murray JosephORCID, Martins Rafaela Costa, Greenland Melanie, Cruz Suélen, Altafim Elisa, Arteche Adriane Xavier, Cooper Peter J., Domingues Marlos Rodrigues, Gonzalez Andrea, Kramer Fiala Machado Adriana, Murray Lynne, Oliveira Isabel, Santos Iná, Soares Tâmara Biolo, Tovo-Rodrigues Luciana, Voysey Merryn
Abstract
AbstractViolence is a major public health problem globally, with the highest rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the Americas and southern Africa. Parenting programmes in high-income countries can diminish risk for violence, by reducing risk factors such as child aggression and harsh parenting, and increasing protective factors such as child cognitive development and school readiness. However, there is critical need to identify low-cost programmes with replicable benefits that work in real-world LMICs contexts. A three-arm, randomised, single-blind trial evaluated effects of two low-cost, group-based parenting programmes recommended for LMICs (ACT: Raising Safe Kids; DBS: dialogic book-sharing) on child aggression (primary outcome), child development, parenting, maltreatment, and stress. Participants were 369 children with medium–high levels of aggression (mean age 3.1 years at baseline) in poor households. Interventions were implemented in city health and education services in southern Brazil. Maternal reports, filmed observations, child tasks, and hair cortisol were assessed at baseline, 1-month post-intervention, and 8-month follow-up. Intention-to-treat analyses compared each of ACT and DBS with a control group. Three hundred sixty-eight (99.7%) participants completed follow-up assessments 8 months after the interventions. There was no effect of ACT (standardised mean difference, SMD 0.11, 95% CI − 0.05, 0.27) or DBS (SMD 0.05, 95% CI − 0.11, 0.21) on the primary outcome of child aggression. ACT reduced harsh parenting behaviour post-intervention (SMD − 0.23; 95% CI − 0.46, − 0.01), but not at follow-up. DBS improved book-sharing practices at both time points (e.g., maternal sensitivity at follow-up SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.08, 0.57). There were no benefits of either programme for other parenting, child development, or stress outcomes. Two parenting programmes in Brazil had small effects on parenting practices but did not reduce child aggression or several other important risk/protective factors for violence. Effective early interventions that reduce violence in real-world LMIC settings are highly desirable but may be challenging to achieve.
Funder
Wellcome Trust Fondation Botnar Pelotas Municipal Government
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Aboud, F. E. (2007). Evaluation of an early childhood parenting programme in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 25(1), 3–13. 2. Altafim, E. R. P., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2019). Preventive intervention for strengthening effective parenting practices: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 62, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.03.003 3. Altafim, E. R. P., McCoy, D. C., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2021). Unpacking the impacts of a universal parenting program on child behavior. Child Development, 92(2), 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13491 4. American Psychological Association. (2022). ACT: Raising safe kids. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/act 5. Backhaus, S., Gardner, F., Melendez-Torres, G., Schafer, M., Knerr, W., & Lachman, J. (2023). World Health Organization Guidelines on parenting interventions to prevent maltreatment and enhance parent–child relationships with children aged 0–17 years: Report of the systematic reviews of evidence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
|
|